Monday, May 20, 2024
From the Wire

Today the FTX jury suffered through a code review

Today, in an intense court session, Gary Wang, the co-founder and CTO of FTX, gave a harrowing testimony regarding the code changes that granted Alameda Research special privileges within the company. Despite holding a relatively small share, Wang took significant risks to ensure Alameda’s account never faced liquidation, while FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried possessed a majority stake. These code alterations allowed Alameda to manipulate its balance, withdraw funds without any reserves, place orders at an astonishing pace, and potentially intercept customer deposits intended for FTX. Shockingly, FTX allegedly deceived investors about the extent of their backstop fund, relying on Alameda to absorb some of their losses. With revelations of a $65 billion line of credit and Alameda’s debt to FTX amounting to $11 billion, Bankman-Fried unscrupulously directed the use of customer funds to repay Alameda’s lenders. As the trial unfolds, Wang’s collaboration with the US government and subsequent admission of guilt aim to secure a more lenient sentence, the outcome of which remains uncertain.

FTX Code Review

Today the FTX jury suffered through a code review

This image is property of


In recent court proceedings, Gary Wang, the co-founder and CTO of FTX, provided testimony about the code changes that gave special privileges to Alameda Research within the FTX platform. This article will explore the details of his testimony, the importance of code review, and the alleged deception and misconduct that occurred at FTX.

Gary Wang’s Testimony

As the co-founder and CTO of FTX, Gary Wang played a crucial role in the development and management of the platform. However, despite his significant contributions, Wang owned a relatively small share in the company compared to CEO Sam Bankman-Fried. This meant that Wang had higher risk exposure for a smaller stake in the company.

During his testimony, Wang highlighted the code changes that were implemented to give Alameda Research, a prominent trading firm, special privileges within the FTX platform. These changes allowed Alameda Research to have a negative balance, withdraw funds without sufficient funds, place orders faster than other users, and potentially receive customer deposits meant for FTX.

Today the FTX jury suffered through a code review

This image is property of

Importance of Code Review

Code review plays a critical role in ensuring the integrity and security of a platform like FTX. It involves a thorough examination of the code by experienced developers to identify and fix any potential vulnerabilities or mistakes. A comprehensive code review process helps maintain the stability of the platform, prevents unauthorized access and fraudulent activities, and safeguards user funds.

Thorough code review has numerous benefits. It helps identify potential bugs, ensures compliance with best practices, enhances overall system performance, and minimizes the risk of exploit by malicious actors. Inadequate code review, on the other hand, can lead to system vulnerabilities, data breaches, and financial losses.

Code Changes and Alameda Research

The code changes implemented at FTX gave Alameda Research significant advantages over other users. This included the ability to have a negative balance, withdraw funds without adequate funds, and execute orders at an accelerated pace. These privileges were specially granted to Alameda Research, raising concerns about fair and equal treatment of all users on the platform.

Today the FTX jury suffered through a code review

This image is property of

FTX CEO’s Instructions

During his testimony, Wang revealed that FTX CEO Sam Bankman-Fried instructed him to ensure that Alameda’s account never gets liquidated on the platform. This instruction highlights the preferential treatment provided to Alameda Research, potentially at the expense of other FTX users.

FTX’s Alleged Deception

FTX is accused of misrepresenting the amount of money in its backstop fund, a reserve meant to cover losses. This alleged deception created a significant financial burden on FTX, which it attempted to alleviate by utilizing Alameda Research to assume some of its losses. This raises serious concerns about the transparency and honesty of FTX’s operations.

Today the FTX jury suffered through a code review

This image is property of

Alameda Research’s Line of Credit

Alameda Research had a line of credit of $65 billion on FTX, surpassing the credit limits typically granted to other users. Moreover, at Bankman-Fried’s request, Wang increased Alameda’s line of credit, further highlighting the preferential treatment given to Alameda Research within the FTX ecosystem.

Alameda’s Debt to FTX

During his involvement with FTX, Wang discovered that Alameda Research owed FTX approximately $11 billion. Shockingly, Bankman-Fried directed the use of FTX customer funds to pay off Alameda’s lenders. This blatant misuse of customer funds is deeply concerning and potentially points to further misconduct by FTX.

Today the FTX jury suffered through a code review

FTX’s Bankruptcy

The financial strain caused by FTX’s questionable practices eventually led the platform to bankruptcy. As the situation deteriorated, Bankman-Fried directed Wang to send customer funds to Bahamanian regulators instead of transferring them back to the US, adding another layer of complexity to the proceedings.

Wang’s Cooperation and Hopes for Leniency

In the face of these allegations, Gary Wang has chosen to cooperate fully with the US government. He has pleaded guilty to various charges, hoping that his cooperation will lead to a lenient sentence. Despite the difficult circumstances, Wang remains optimistic that justice will be served and that the lessons learned from this case will improve the integrity and security of future trading platforms.


The FTX code review testimony provided by Gary Wang sheds light on the alleged misconduct and deception that occurred within the platform. It highlights the importance of thorough code review and the potential risks associated with inadequate review processes. The preferential treatment given to Alameda Research, the misuse of customer funds, and FTX’s eventual bankruptcy raise serious concerns about the transparency and integrity of the platform. As the legal proceedings continue, it is crucial that thorough investigations take place to ensure accountability and prevent similar incidents in the future.