Saturday, June 15, 2024
From the Wire

The Gruesome Story of How Neuralink’s Monkeys Actually Died

In a shocking turn of events, Elon Musk has come under fire with fresh allegations of potential securities fraud surrounding the deaths of monkeys used for research at Neuralink. A medical ethics group has called for an investigation into Musk’s claims that the monkeys were terminally ill and did not die due to Neuralink implants. However, veterinary records and interviews with former employees and researchers paint a gruesome picture of complications and suffering experienced by the primates, including bloody diarrhea, partial paralysis, and cerebral edema. As the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine demands the truth about the safety of Neuralink’s speculative product, it becomes evident that this is not the first time federal probes have been launched into the company’s animal testing. With the potential involvement of the US Securities and Exchange Commission, investors are left questioning the credibility of Neuralink’s claims.

The Gruesome Story of How Neuralink’s Monkeys Actually Died

This image is property of media.wired.com.

Allegations of Securities Fraud

Fresh allegations against Elon Musk

Recently, fresh allegations of potential securities fraud have been leveled against Elon Musk, the CEO of Neuralink. These allegations stem from statements made by Musk regarding the deaths of primates used for research at Neuralink.

Claims regarding deaths of primates

According to Musk, the monkeys who died during trials at Neuralink were terminally ill and did not die as a result of the Neuralink implants. However, a medical ethics group has called on the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) to investigate these claims. They argue that there may be misleading information surrounding the primate deaths and that further scrutiny is necessary.

The Gruesome Story of How Neuralink’s Monkeys Actually Died

This image is property of media.wired.com.

Complications and Suffering Endured by Primates

Veterinary records and interviews with former employees

In order to shed light on the situation, veterinary records and interviews with former Neuralink employees and researchers have been examined. These records and interviews reveal some alarming details about the complications and suffering endured by the primate subjects.

Bloody diarrhea and partial paralysis

It has been reported that the primates suffered from various health issues, including bloody diarrhea and partial paralysis. These symptoms indicate that the primates may have experienced significant distress during the trials.

Cerebral edema

The veterinary records also indicate that some primates developed cerebral edema, a condition characterized by the accumulation of fluid in the brain. This raises concerns about the potential neurological impact of Neuralink’s implants on these animals.

The Gruesome Story of How Neuralink’s Monkeys Actually Died

This image is property of media.wired.com.

Misleading Comments and Investor Rights

Claims by the Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine

The Physicians Committee for Responsible Medicine has come forward with claims that Elon Musk’s comments about the primate deaths were misleading. They argue that investors deserve to hear the truth about the safety of Neuralink’s speculative product.

Importance of truth about Neuralink’s product safety

While Neuralink’s technology has the potential to revolutionize the field of neuroscience, it is crucial for investors to have accurate and transparent information about the safety of the product. Misleading statements regarding animal testing can erode trust and confidence in the company.

Investor rights and transparency

Investors have the right to make informed decisions based on accurate and reliable information. Transparency regarding the potential risks and ethical implications of Neuralink’s research is essential to uphold these rights and ensure responsible investment practices.

The Gruesome Story of How Neuralink’s Monkeys Actually Died

This image is property of media.wired.com.

Previous Federal Probes

Investigations by the US Department of Agriculture’s Office of Inspector General and the US Department of Transportation

This is not the first time that Neuralink’s animal testing has come under federal scrutiny. Both the US Department of Agriculture’s Office of Inspector General and the US Department of Transportation have previously launched investigations into Neuralink’s practices.

Relevance of animal testing in federal investigations

These federal probes highlight the significance of animal testing in scientific research and the ethical concerns surrounding it. The findings of these investigations can shed light on the potential violations of regulations and guidelines in place to protect animal welfare during experimentation.

The Gruesome Story of How Neuralink’s Monkeys Actually Died

This image is property of media.wired.com.

SEC Jurisdiction and Privately Held Companies

The role of the SEC in overseeing securities

The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) plays a crucial role in overseeing the sale of securities in the United States. Its primary purpose is to protect investors, maintain fair and efficient markets, and facilitate capital formation. The SEC has the authority to investigate allegations of securities fraud to ensure compliance with regulations and promote transparency.

Jurisdiction over privately held companies like Neuralink

Although Neuralink is a privately held company, it does not exempt it from the SEC’s jurisdiction. The SEC has the authority to investigate allegations of securities fraud regardless of the company’s status. This means that if the allegations against Elon Musk and Neuralink are substantiated, the SEC can take appropriate action to protect investors and maintain the integrity of the market.

In conclusion, the fresh allegations of potential securities fraud against Elon Musk and Neuralink raise serious concerns about the accuracy and transparency of the information provided to investors. The suffering and complications endured by the primate subjects are alarming, and the calls for further investigation by a medical ethics group highlight the importance of ethical scientific practices. The previous federal probes into Neuralink’s animal testing further demonstrate the need for regulatory oversight in this area. As a privately held company, Neuralink is not exempt from the SEC’s jurisdiction, and it is imperative that the SEC thoroughly investigates these allegations to ensure the protection of investors and the maintenance of fair and efficient markets. Transparency, accuracy, and responsible investment practices are essential in the pursuit of groundbreaking technological advancements while upholding ethical considerations.

Source: https://www.wired.com/story/elon-musk-pcrm-neuralink-monkey-deaths/